Class and inequality ( Lect 2) – The Divide, why?

The world is filled with inequality.

This was the thought that first came to my mind when the lecture topic was revealed.  A utopian society is impossible to achieve, hence imperfection and inequality are inevitable. The extent differs, though. Rich and poor people exist in both rich and poor countries, though in many of the poorer countries the extent of inequality is greater.

With inequality, there is the issue of poverty. In fact, half the world – nearly three billion people, live on less than US$2 a day. [1] Many people living in comfortable homes in developed countries are not aware of this acute problem of poverty, so rampant in developing countries and their own countries. No country is immune to poverty; even the wealthiest of nations have a large gap between the rich and the poor. This was in fact one of the reasons for the introduction of communism in the early 20th century. They believed in equality and that a large gap between the rich and the poor should not exist. This was one of the driving factors for Mao, the leader of the Chinese Communist Party in China, to unleash the Cultural Revolution in China in the 1950s. He wanted to create a utopian society, and failed. The issue of poverty and its eliminating strategies is one of the toughest development challenges facing the world today.

With all the poverty and suffering, we wonder why there is so much inequality in the world. People work hard, but still remain poor?

One reason is the access to education. With better technology, there is a higher demand for higher skilled workers, resulting in an increase in the wages of such workers. People who lack the opportunity to attain an education or a higher education end up doing lower skilled jobs, with a lower pay. This creates a vicious circle, making it difficult to break out of this poverty cycle to attain a proper education. This creates inequality.

People’s abilities and their drive to succeed can also play a part. This is a factor that is more critical in the more developed countries. People with a certain set of skills or intellectual ability are in greater demand, hence command a higher pay. People with disabilities or are ‘less intellectually developed’ end up depending on other people or organizations. Once again, creating a vicious circle of poverty and inequality.

In Sernau’s book on Global Problems, he highlighted two schools of thought: modernization theory and dependency theory, as to why poor nations are poor. I agree with the idea that the economies of the poor countries are structured to serve the needs of wealthy foreigners and maybe small internal elite, as described in the dependency theory. [2] Developing countries provide cheaper labour, resulting in MNCs choosing to set up factories in these countries, creating employment. This benefits these countries, but creates a form of imperialism, and these countries have to play by the rules set by the MNCs. Unless the poorer countries find a way to not rely as much on imperialism, developing their own technology and local companies, the inequality cycle will still remain!

It is a major challenge to overcome this problem of poverty.  Totally eradicating poverty is impossible, with its deep seeded problems beyond our control. However we still have to continue with our attempts to minimize its effects. A utopian society is impossible to achieve. After all, people were never made equal. 

 

 

 



[1] Poverty facts and stats – global issues, Mar 4 2008, http://www.globalissues.org/article/26/poverty-facts-and-stats

[2] Sernau S. (2006), Global Problems the search for equity peace and sustainability (p22-26) , Pearson

Leave a comment »

Social Problems in a Global Context (lect 1) – Spread of diseases!

When I approached this topic, the first question that had to be answered was – what constitutes a social problem?

An online dictionary defines social problems as situations affecting a significant number of people, that are believed to be sources of difficulty or threaten the stability of the community, and that require programs of amelioration. [1]

 

The impact of social problems in a global context is sometimes hard to fathom, especially for people who are not directly involved. Such problems include environmental degradation, wealth vs. poverty and domestic violence, which were mentioned in Prof Amir’s lecture. Increased globalization, brought about by the increased dependence on IT, has brought about problems as well. With greater interconnectedness and interdependence, globalization can be said to spread global problems.

 

One social problem that immediately comes to mind is that of the spread of diseases, an issue I believe is very much related to globalization.

 

The ease of communication has brought about connectedness throughout the world. The concept of viewing human capital in the global sense has brought about unprecedented movement of people around the world. This increase in human traffic across the world, in turn has led to the spread of diseases. An example of this would be the SARS episode that caught Singapore off guard in 2003. The epidemic started in the Guangdong province in China, and spread to Hong Kong and Singapore, as well as many countries such as Canada, Taiwan and Vietnam. This spread was a result of human traffic and the convenience of travel in this day and time. AIDS is another example of a disease, which was rapidly transmitted around the world as a result of modern travel. The global nature of food handling and trade may have also led to this increase in the spread of infectious diseases around the world. Trade is conducted faster than ever before, and so has the spread of diseases.

 

To be optimistic, globalization has actually led in the trend towards finding solutions to this problem of the spread of diseases. One such platform is the World Health Organization (WHO), in providing leadership on global health matters. Globalization has also led to the spread in medical advances, and facilitated the movement of doctors and members of medical teams to the more rural parts of the world. Now, even the most rural nations have access to medication and medical technology, with the help of globalization and modern travel!

 

However, aid distribution still remains a big problem. Despite the interconnectedness promised by globalization, in many situations, aid provided does not reach people who need it most. Myanmar is just one example. When cyclone Nargis struck, the government had total control over the aid provided by other nations and other charitable organizations. Much of the aid did not reach the people, who were in dire need of medical care, food, water and lodging. A lot of the aid only reached the people much later.  

 

 

Just by opening our eyes and being more aware of the happenings in the world, we will be able to see the seriousness of social problems happening all around us. To end this, I definitely believe in the benefits of globalization as it brings countries together in an attempt to solve these global social problems. Without forgetting how it encourages economic and technological advancements, of course. However, this connectivity also brings about the spread of other things, such as the spread of infectious diseases. The world must now try to cope with these problems, in the best way possible. Technology is a major factor in leading to the spread of infectious diseases, with its connectivity and convenience. I do hope it can minimize and eventually stop the spread of infectious diseases in time to come!

 


[1]Online Medical Dictionary, Dec 12 1998, http://cancerweb.ncl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/omd?social+problems

Leave a comment »

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!

Comments (1) »